🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or withhold as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive attacks on freedom have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Using Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The latest limitations are being defended by referring to last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably can't draw the line at democracy," commented a prominent American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and direct action against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its warfare have led the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning threshold by banning Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for carrying signs against genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; including a retired priest and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may ultimately regret how casually we allowed them to be eroded.