🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts raised concerns that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary states the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We live in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator commented: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.